User talk:Ozler

Albums reviews

Please stop adding more than ten reviews to articles. Per WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews, articles should contain no more than ten reviews. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 20:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Professional reviews

Please stop putting the professional reviews in bold letters. Bold letters are for section headings, and for names/titles. Also, reviewers which are websites (Allmusic, RapReviews, Slant, etc.) do not get italics. Italics are for titles of actual prints (magazines, albums, movies, books - not websites.)
I sugest giving the Wikipedia style guidelines a thorough read.--Blastmaster11 (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Album reviews

Hey, you're doing an awesome job of adding reviews to album articles! Just a few minor formatting things I wanted to point out (some of which are mentioned above):

The sources of the reviews should be listed in alphabetical order
The names of publications should be italicized (Rolling Stone, The Source), the names of websites should not (Allmusic, RapReviews)
Ratings of more than 5 stars should be written out (e.g. 6/10) in parentheses and shouldn't use the ratings template
Ratings shouldn't be italicized or in boldface (i.e. B not B, favorable not favorable)

Of course, technically, reviews aren't supposed to be included in infoboxes any more but better there than not at all. Keep up the good work! TheJazzDalek (talk) 00:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're continuing to put ratings in boldface, in addition, you've changed some existing ratings to incorrectly reflect the actual review (e.g. a RapReviews rating 4/10 that you changed to 4/5). Please stop doing that. It's great that you're adding reviews but please don't expect others to clean up behind you. TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello TheJazzDalek

As you know my name is ozler, I'm a little new in wiki and my english doesn't allow me to always understand your notices.

I want to apologise for this, i'll try to do the things correctly for now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozler (talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If there's ever anything that you don't understand, please don't hesitate to ask. Like I said, you're doing a great job of adding reviews; your work is appreciated. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ozler. You have new messages at TheJazzDalek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Back to Love (Anthony Hamilton album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page About (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Napalm (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Napalm (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XXL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you recently removed some content from O.N.I.F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 14:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cold Day In Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XXL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ozler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ozler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]