User talk:Password00

Password00

June 2014

Hello, Password00, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Password00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is a mistake i have been wrongly blocked. i am not hacked or a sockpuppet. this is unafair and abuse

Decline reason:

I would disagree. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 00:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

After reviewing deleted contribs, I have removed talk page access and email function, and the additional unblock request. I have also blanked the user page of the sockmaster claim, as (in my opinion) the certainty isn't sufficient to make the claim against that particular sockmaster. If a CU wants to investigate and retag, that is fine but it seems pointless. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 00:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]