User talk:Paved with good intentions
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Paved with good intentions! I am BurtAlert and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!
BurtAlert (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Mikael Rahm has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mikael Rahm. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Djurgårdslinjen[edit]
Eftersom du är svensk ställer jag en fråga på svenska. Är "Djurgård line" verkligen en rimlig "översättning" av Djurgårdslinjen? För mig låter det som en redigt hemsnickrad "svengelska". Finns det andra exempel på liknande namnformer? Artikeln om Roslagsbanan heter just så och inte "Roslag track" eller något liknande. --Muniswede (talk) 23:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Det är den enda rimliga översättningen om man alls skall översätta namnet. Man kan inte lägga in den bestämda artikeländelsen på slutet av ett ord när det sätts ihop med ett ord efteråt, och det gäller även vid översättning. Paved with good intentions (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Vidare diskussion får du gärna ta på artikelns diskussionssida i stället. Paved with good intentions (talk) 11:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
A pie for you![edit]
|
I noted your username and think it's a nice one, so I thought I should let you know that. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC) |
ANI notification[edit]
After verification by a swedish checkuser (Dcastor) your latest sockpupets on svwp have been blocked. I've asked for a block on your accounts here as well. GameOn (talk) 06:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why, thank you most kindly! Paved with good intentions (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Experimentalfältet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Belongs at Stockholm University. A Swedish title is not useful in an English-language encyclopedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Experimentalfältet for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Experimentalfältet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experimentalfältet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)