User talk:Pboylan3
The outline is very thorough, so the only suggestion I have for improvement is to reorder some of your sections: as a better introduction to Pompeiian frescoes for the general reader, I would put the Significant Sites section right after the overview, and then discuss Composition and Materials. You may already be planning on doing this, but I also suggest including pictures, especially of your significant sites.
One additional resource you could include in your See Also section would articles about Herculaneum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herculaneum While Pompeii was buried in ash, Herculaneum was hit with mud and lava, so the excavation has been much slower. It would make an interesting contrast to your article.
You are following Wikipedia guidelines in that your outline is well structured and everything is appropriately cited. Overall, you did an excellent job!
MuseeDesReves (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Peri, This outline looks amazing! It’s so thorough and covers all the bases that are relevant in this topic. I like that you break up the restoration methods into older and current methods, it helps contextualize the earlier work that’s been done on the frescoes. For the overview I would suggest having two different sections that cover the history of Pompeii and the history of the frescoes separately. I would also suggest moving up the relevant sites so that they immediately follow the overview and history of the frescoes. I might suggest including the Wikipedia page for the National Archaeological Museum in Naples in the see also section, since a lot of the frescoes are housed there. In terms of Wikipedia style, I would look out for using title capitalization rather than sentence capitalization in your headings and article title. Other than that this is a really amazing start and I can’t wait to see the finished product!
Kelsey Kmanahan1221 (talk) 22:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Conservation and restoration of Pompeian frescoes has been accepted
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)