User talk:PerryThePlatypusFan

I Agree

Okay, that's good, do what you want, but just know that it was not CD-TDA's fault, it was mine. CD-TDA is a good user in the Wiki and there is no reason why to mock her or get mad at her, she did nothing wrong. I was the one who did really bad things in the Wiki and I deserve my ban. So yeah, it was my choice to leave the Wiki, and I don't think that I would be coming back anytime soon, unless there is a Season 5, of course. Giggett (talk) 06:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I went too far on the wiki (i.e. getting mad at CD because she made threats to ban me for fluffing--six edits in a row), which led me to leaving the wiki. I now agree that I can't overreact to the unfair treatment that admins give me on the wiki. --Alarcon Hills 16:49, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Total Drama

Well since this is a Canadian show, we only add in the Canadian winners and outcomes. Giggett (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still, this does NOT answer my question on how you reverted my string of edits (under my Perry-the-Platypus name, and my IP address). I always thought that it would be impossible to revert two users edits to its original format, due to intermediate edit confllicts. Agent Perry 07:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He/she viewed the history. Then, he/she clicked on the revision that was before the edits you made. He/she then clicked the "Edit" button; after that, he/she clicked the "Save page" button. If you do that with a previous revision, all revisions made after that one will be undone. :) Ha dg er 23:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Hi, I just noticed that you tried to nominate yourself for Adminship. The template was not properly transcluded and hence I have removed it. An RfA is usually successful only for editors who have significant experience. You might want to read this: Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates --Anbu121 (talk me) 15:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

First, I'd advise withdrawing your RfA before your feelings get badly hurt. Believe me, you've no chance and things can get nasty at RfA. Secondly, with reference to comments above about reverting edits, nothing is impossible to revert on Wikipedia. It may take a bit of twiddling, but it can be done. Also in this connection, do I read it right that you were editing both with your account and your IP address? Not a good thing. This can be regarded as sockpuppetry WP:SOCK, and it sounds from what you say as if you were trying to make reversion impossible. That can be regarded as an abuse of editing privileges. On a more positive note, read up about what admins actually do - and read other RfAs to see why people get rejected. An example of what we don't do is blocking people for reverting our edits unless it is pure vandalism; I'm not sure you know the difference between vandalism and content dispute yet. There's a heck of a lot of Wikipedia that you need to know about, and in a couple of hundred edits you will have hardly scratched the surface. Peridon (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Too late - it's been closed under SNOW. Good job really - the heavy brigade hadn't arrived yet. Take note of what we've said and look at both successful and unsuccessful RfAs to see what's what, and what you've escaped... Peridon (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hi Perry! Sorry, but I've closed your request per WP:NOTNOW. The request however would not had passed as you are not ready yet. I see that your intentions were to benefit the community but you lack in experience. You have done good job on Wikipedia and thanks for your contributions. Editors are at least expected to have a few thousand edits and experience of 1 year or some. It is because only 300 edits tell us nothing about your ability and understanding of policies. You can be an admin in future once you are experienced but not now. I appreciate your efforts so far made to the project and wish you all the best for future. If there is anything you would like to ask, feel free :) Happy editing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU 23:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read: WP:Advice for RfA candidates and especially all the links it contains. Not that you should be reconsidring adminship any time soon, but it will show you clearly what you are up against. One question - did you not see the warning before you transcluded your RfA? If it's not working, or if you didn't want to take its advice, it would help us to know why. We're always looking to improve our RfA process. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding American Information to Total Drama Articles

Hi. Please stop adding American information to Total Drama articles. Along with that, you should also stop editing with your IP in order to make it harder for us to undo your edits. :) Ha dg er 03:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Giggett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. I know that you were already warned, but that was a few months ago. That's why I'm warning you again. After this, though, there will be no more warnings. Ha dg er 03:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I promise not to attack Giggett, as of that day. Agent Perry 20:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elimination tables

Please don't bring back the elimination tables. They are way too cluttered, and way to trivial to be in the main season articles. Also, we already have elimination tables in the List of Total Drama episodes page where I see that you just modified them again. Giggett (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Total Drama characters

The information that you have added to the Character Participation table is incorrect. The Aftermath 4 of TDA is counted, since both Beth and Duncan were still in the game in that episode. So only 3 TDA aftermaths should not be counted, not all 4. So Duncan competed in 24 TDA episodes while Beth competed in 23 (1 less for Beth since Beth was not in TDWT). However, you stated that Duncan competed in 23 episodes and Beth in 22. That is not true since only 3 TDA aftermaths are not being counted, while the fourth one is. So can you please revert the 3 edits that you just did on the table? Giggett (talk) 07:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before I added the "excluding TDA's "The Aftermath: IV"." part to the notice, I thought you meant "Aftermath episodes and other special episodes are not counted in this table". Agent Perry 07:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was my mistake too, and also thanks for correcting me on the TDWT episodes with Heather and Alejandro. I was counting Episode 26 twice when it should only be once.

January 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - T P 22:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PerryThePlatypusFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unbanned, because the way I was treated on the Spanish Wikipedia, was really unfair. You might understand I was untreated unfairly (especially when Saloca banned my new IP Address (this was my second time, NOW) on the Spanish version of the site), but my response to the ban (by vandalizing his/her talk page, saying stuff that isn't true about them) was inexcusable, and violates the Terms of Use. If you deny my request, to be unbanned, I promise that I'll participate in a community outside of Wikipedia. Another thing, if you don't accept my request, then I will not sockpuppet/evade bans, just like I did in the Spanish version. Agent Perry 06:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Having seen the appalling way you treat people with whom you have disputes (especially disputes in which you admit you were wrong - socking on the Spanish Wikipedia), and with your doing it after having had warnings for making personal attacks on others too, I really cannot see how unblocking you would be of benefit to this project. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Insults_and_offenses. Thank you. v/r - T P 22:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]