User talk:Persecuted editors

Hello Wikipedia

I'm starting to edit today. So hold on !! (🙂PS: Just kidding guys🙂) --Persecuted editors (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Welcome! Hello, Persecuted editors, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

☻☻Thank you for the warm greetings and valuable links. I have been researching scientific and popular science topics for many years. (I also have a historical education) However, I'm actually quite new to Wikipedia. So I will be grateful for your advice. I hope that my knowledge of history and other topics will be useful here --Persecuted editors (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My contribution

1) 15.09.21

I wrote a paragraph about the position of researchers who advocate for social media. Without this information, the subtitle "Social media bias" was incomplete and seemed excessively one-sided. In addition, I provided a link to a source of information for 2021 (while the paragraph cited older sources)

--Persecuted editors (talk) 17:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2)21.09.21

10:59, 21 September 2021 diff hist +1,750‎ Media bias ‎ →‎Social media bias: position of researchers who advocate for social media. (Added and corrected). I've corrected the citation method so that I don't feel like I'm infringing on someone else's copyright.🙂 In addition, I supplemented the information with references to reliable sourcesю https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Media_bias&oldid=1045591293 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Media_bias&diff=prev&oldid=1045591293 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Media_bias&action=history --Persecuted editors (talk) 11:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3) 27.09.2021

15:03, 27 September 2021 diff hist +871‎ Shared information bias ‎ →‎Causes: Quoting a new source (2017) current "Shared information bias". Supplemented the information in the subtitle. + Why, presenting an accomplice's task can be helpful. "At the same time, when acting together with others toward a joint goal, representing a co-actor’s task can be beneficial as it enables agents to predict others’ actions and to integrate them into their own action plan. For example, knowledge about a co-actor’s task can be useful if access to online perceptual information about the co-actor’s action is unavailable such that monitoring the co-actor’s unfolding action and continuously adjusting in an appropriate manner is not possible. This was shown in a study where dyads coordinated forward jumps of different distances such that they would land at the same time ."

+ a reliable source of information for 2017 Joint Action: Mental Representations, Shared Information and General Mechanisms for Coordinating with Others.MINI REVIEW article [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02039/full Front. Psychol., 04 January 2017

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Persecuted editors! Your additions to Media bias have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction.

Thanks for the correction. For now, I've corrected the citation method so that I don't feel like I'm infringing on someone else's copyright.🙂 In addition, I supplemented the information with references to reliable sources --Persecuted editors (talk) 10:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]