User talk:Petiatil

This is Petiatil's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2

Please SIGN your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Thank You.
I know this is redundant, but nobody ever does it.

Speedy deletion declined: David Drocco

Hello Petiatil. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of David Drocco, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Playing for a notable team indicates importance/significance. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:18, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion declined: David Drocco

Thank you for bringing that to my atttention, my mistake. However, as I recall the article didn't establish remarkability, perhaps more content was added after my nomination for CSD. Either way, my mistake. Thanks again, cheers. Petiatil (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As he plays for a club in his country's top-level, he is assumed to be sufficiently notable to avoid speedy deletion. However, you are welcome to either Propose the article for deletion (PROD) or take it to Articles for deletion (AfD) - it just doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 05:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I patrol RC so I wont bother to AfD the article.... I'm done with it, kinda like the 3RR, i'll let someone else decide of it should be AfD or prod.... Petiatil (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Afd Zakir

I am marking this as withdrawn following WP:WITHDRAWN regards--DBig Xray 11:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks again. Toodles.... »Petiatil ^{( talk  contribs)} 11:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --DBig Xray 11:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar

Hello Petiatil, DBig Xray 11:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing![reply]
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks a lot for the appreciation of my contributions and the Barnstar,I am honored DBig Xray 11:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

= A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Awarded for great contributions in protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Good work never goes unrewarded. Regards DBig Xray 12:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yay wikilove »Petiatil ^{( talk  contribs)} 02:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edition reversal in List of tautologial place names

Hi,

You have reverted an edit on the List of tautological place names as Reverted unexplained removal of content. In fact, the editor had provided a link to the German wikipedia, which explains that the name Ulrichsberg comes from the name of a man called Ulrich, a name which has no Slovene origin and whose meaning has nothing to do with peaks or mountains. So, if you don't mind, I am replacing that edition.--Gorpik (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I know those vandalizing edits are a pain and we all sometimes undo changes that should have been left there. Cheers.--Gorpik (talk) 12:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Naxal attack in Darbha valley

Hi You have edited the article above to remove my inputs. Ajit Jogi was in fact lifted by an air ambulance after the rally, and was not part of the motorcade that was hit my the naxalites. I am not sure on how to provide references, but the following and many such links would prove my point. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-05-30/india/39627881_1_sukma-maoists-dantewada — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.72.44.242 (talk) 04:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Memory improvement

You reverted the edits I had made on the "Memory improvement" article, where I removed a couple of chunks of text.

I think my edits shouldn't have been reverted - I found those chunks to be questionable.

-In particular, the chunk in "Chronic stress" made a misleading example (claiming that the hippocampal shrinkage in taxi drivers was due to stress). The idea isn't supported in the cited medical sources (nor do other sources, clinical evidence, etc. support the idea from what I've seen). Furthermore, it was outright contradicted by the source that was supposed to support it. (If you need clarification, let me know.)

-The chunk in "Oxygen therapy" (idea that people's cognition are limited by their oxygen level) is found to be merely an Alternative Medicine claim and unsupported by evidence, according to the FDA (as I found in the Oxygen bar article). Thus I considered it to not warrant place in the article. 96.48.197.114 (talk) 06:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edition in Julius Richard Petri

Hi Petiatil. You reverted the edit I had made on the "[Richard Petri]" article, where I removed a portrait. I'm afraid that it should be [Robert Koch](Who was Petri's Boss)'s portrait. This image may be originated from U.S. National Library of Medicine and we could see Koch's signature on the image clearly. Would you please check what I've said? Thank you.--Chqjed (talk) 07:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

not done, too much vandalism on that article. See WP:images and WP:Manual of style for more information... »Petiatil ^{( talk  contribs)} 09:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Petiatil. Thanks for your note on my talk page. Given the long history of Dr. Petri, and the import of his work and the petri dish, I think the random fact that Google chose to highlight him on his birthday is not really worth noting in an encyclopedia, which is more about the import of the scientist and his work. As an analogy, if this were the page on Sigmund Freud, or Charles Darwin, or any other scientist, and Google took a day to make note of these people, would that really be put on their wiki pages? Seems rather trivial and not suited to a real encyclopaedia. Gacggt (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Just a tip. If someone's blanked an article, look at the history. If they're the creator of it, and no-one else has done more than maintenance or copyed, tag it G7 (author request to delete). If not sure about other edits, either tag it or ask an admin. If an IP has blanked it, revert and message them to do it signed in. If someone else has blanked it, consider if it's vandalism... Peridon (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

False Accusations - I didn't do that .

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Robert E. Pattison. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -petiatil »user»speak 20:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC) I never even touched that person's page. Because it was impossible as I didn't have a internet connection and I was cooking Sausage while trying to watch the Super Bowl. I have proof that I was watching the Super Bowl and not vandalizing Robert E. Pattison Wiki page.

~~Razor1911~~. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.53.89 (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]