User talk:Phrafarang

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. --Ronz (talk) 21:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Phrafarang. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no bias to spam, nor have I shown one.

The quote and reference to B. Bodhi + links are supportive to the Terminology section on mindfulness. How is a source "reliable" Contemporary Buddhism, Vol. 12, issue 1, May 2011?

Best wishes

I do not have multiple accounts, and the spamming issue has not been answered.

While I think an indefinite block is probably overkill in this situation, you appear to have edited the same article as 65.31.53.155 (talk · contribs), who repeatedly added the exact same link to the same article in the exact same location. Your first edit was to simple revert to the last edit by 65.31.53.155. That was edit-warring and sockpuppetry.

You appear to be the same person that added the material to scribd.com, which indicates there's a likely conflict of interest as well. (On a side note, I'm a bit concerned over potential copyright problems with it being there as well. I've started a discussion here) --Ronz (talk) 02:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]