User talk:Pickbothmanlol6

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abce2|AccessDenied 20:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol6 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Abce2|AccessDenied 20:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pickbothmanlol6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only was making an edit to the article Life After People: The Series's timeline that was featured in the episode "Heavy Metal" and you already start the reverting.Not all edits I make are considered vandalism just because I for some reason picked an account name of some vandal.Dont give me the sockpuppet bullcrap in a reply if your going to deny this.

Decline reason:

I am indeed going to give you the 'sockpuppet bullcrap'; this request doesn't address the reason for your block, which is the abuse of multiple accounts. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Seems like a fair question: why'd you pick the same name as a prolific sockmaster? Seems like an unusual coincidence. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a secret.I have a few accounts that are dormant but not blocked. Pickbothmanlol6 (talk) 14:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One for constructive edits and the other for well you know. Pickbothmanlol6 (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But take my word that I was trying to help you with the timeline on that article I mentioned. Pickbothmanlol6 (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pickbothmanlol, the best solution is just to continue editing Wikipedia as an anonymous IP. Don't brag about who you are or anything. Surely there's some IP you can edit from, the admins can't control that. It's what I did, it works fine. Some people get so worked up about Wikipedia, want to save their accounts, want to catch sockpuppets, etc. Who cares? Just edit. This is an encyclopedia, not some drama game. See WP:DGAF. Happy editing. 71.113.25.147 (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]