User talk:Pili Hunters

February 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Inwangsa, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Junggye-dong. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:39, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pili Hunters, LLC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pili Hunters, LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dark-World25 (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please view my account unblock request:

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pili Hunters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ben Mantok (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

When I created my account, I wanted to create a page for a company that I saw on Shark Tank that was selling a favorite snack of mine from the Bicol region of the Philippines where I am from. I did not read the page very closely and ended up naming my account Pili Hunters on accident. The article took me a long time to research and get pictures for. Can you please unban my account and accept my name change request? Can you also restore my article? It took me a very long time to make and now it is just gone. And no one will be able to learn as much about pili nuts. I do not work for Pili Hunters. I just want to help people learn about the place I am from.

Decline reason:

No, clearly not. In addition to the blatantly promotional content, you've also uploaded images which you explicitly claimed you owned, and which appeared on eatpilinuts.com. So either you are lying now or you were lying then (and if so, you were placing the entire project in jeopardy). Either way, you have some explaining to do. Yamla (talk) 17:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pili Hunters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ben Mantok (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

You have confusing rules on Wikipedia and you seem to not be a very kind person. You delete the hard work of people who just want to provide information to the world. If you have to tell people on your profile that you are not kind when interacting with people, that is something that you need to change. How do you expect the community to grow when you so easily dismiss people who are willing to contribute to it? Does it make you feel happy to waste people's time and destroy work? How would you feel if someone just deleted your work? Now I see why there is so much fake information on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You need to convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked, and describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]