User talk:Pokajanje

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Yi Syllabary Chart.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yi Syllabary Chart.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 21:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Determination of the day of the week[edit]

You have rewritten the section "A tabular and method to calculate the day of the week". Would you like to tell me what is the real reason? Thanks! --Q5968661 (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

The section has been removed, not rewritten. And it was not I who removed it. Pokajanje|Talk 16:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
"22:33, 6 December 2012‎ Pokajanje (13,682 bytes) (-5,631)‎ (A tabular method to calculate the day of the week: Completely rewrote section. The old method was confusing, too technical, and might have contained misinformation.)"
Yes, it is not "rewritten" and it is "rewrote". The man who want to delete this article is ElKevbo! Q5968661 (talk) 03:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Working out the details at Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement[edit]

The RFC for TAFI is nearing it's conclusion, and it's time to hammer out the details over at the project's talk page. There are several details of the project that would do well with wider input and participation, such as the article nomination and selection process, the amount and type of articles displayed, the implementation on the main page and other things. I would like to invite you to comment there if you continue to be interested in TAFI's development. --NickPenguin(contribs) 02:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


Simple English proposal at the Pump[edit]

Hello,

As one of the participants in the original Village Pump RFC about getting the Simple Wiki to the top of the Languages, you are invited to participate in the reopened discussion of the same. Your feedback will be appreciated.

Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice[edit]

A Request for Comment has been called at Talk:Watchmen. As a registered editor who has edited that page over the past year, you may wish to comment.    --Tenebrae (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quartics[edit]

If you are interested, you could help us improve the article on quartic functions. The general formula for roots obviously fails to cover the special cases when either t or Delta or u + v are 0. — 79.113.242.231 (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I am very interested, but mathematics isn't my best area of expertise. Pokajanje|Talk 19:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quartic function, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multiplicity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Mindless Vandalism :-)[edit]

Hi, Pokajanje ! :-) I took the liberty to "vandalize" your user page a bit.. ;-) I sincerely hope you enjoy it! :-) — 79.113.238.214 (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

No. Pokajanje|Talk 16:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Sorry. :-( At least now you'll always have a page that displays the quartic formula the way you like it. (Since the way it ultimately appeared in the article displeases you). — 79.113.238.214 (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
I have already made myself a private copy. Pokajanje|Talk 01:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Exact Values Up To 90[edit]

Hey, I left you a comment with some links on the talk page of one of your special pages. Did you see it ? Was it helpful ? — 79.113.221.193 (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes and yes. The pointer to the article containing all the multiples of three will be very useful, once I get around to adding them. The problem is that all the other angles can only be found through , and the solution to the cubic yields imaginary units. Pokajanje|Talk 15:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
The root of your troubles stems from the fact that there is no inherent "360-ness" to Pi. :-) 360 happens to be the approximate number of days in a year. And it also divides nicely into halves, thirds, quarters, and tenths (since people have ten fingers on their hands). These are random, antropomorphic reasons; not mathematical ones. — 79.113.208.251 (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Payphone (song). However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] SummerPhD (talk) 03:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm fully aware. Believe it or not, that was an accident. My browser has a profanity blocker, and it even blocks text in text fields. I assumed that the blocked text would be submitted normally when I made my intended edit (the vocal range). I did not consciously remove the swear words. Pokajanje|Talk 22:02, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Replicant (operating system)[edit]

Hello there! Regarding your edit on the Replicant (operating system), those are the devices already examined by the Replicant developers and rejected as inappropriate for porting due to lack of free firmware, bad hardware interconnections etc. In other words, we're not keeping a list of all devices that will never see Replicant ported to them, but just the devices explicitly rejected as inappropriate. Hope it makes sense. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 05:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions)[edit]

Hallo. I've just noticed that you've just blanked Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) and redirected to Wikipedia:Page name. While I believe this to be a good faith edit, there are a number of problems with you doing so:

(a) Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) is a guideline. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.

(b) Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) is an altogether less technical description than on Wikipedia:Page name. Doing so may make guidelines more difficult to follow.

(c) Some content in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) is not in Wikipedia:Page name.

(d) Sections such as "Restrictions on usernames" would not be appropriate on Wikipedia:Page name.


Mrjulesd (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

In response to A, I was just trying to be bold. All other points understood and accepted. I will make no attempt to maintain this choice if others do not agree with it. Pokajanje|Talk 01:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. That's all fine then. --Mrjulesd (talk) 09:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
You asked me why I restored those examples here. Well it was because I felt they improved the article, and were friendly for newbies. But anyway, its a small point, so I think I'll leave it at that. --Mrjulesd (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mozilla Public License, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Pokajanje. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


Your GA nomination of Mozilla Public License[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mozilla Public License you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Pokajanje. You have new messages at Talk:Mozilla Public License/GA1.
Message added 18:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mozilla Public License[edit]

The article Mozilla Public License you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mozilla Public License for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

I nominated the article at a time when I was passionate about the topic and had time to work on it. Both are no longer true. Is there any way I could withdraw the nomination or something and not have it counted as a failure? Pokajanje|Talk 06:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
I just now saw your response above. I think so, but am not sure. Let me check and I'll get back to you. Shearonink (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Pokajanje. When a review is closed, regardless of the circumstances, it will still count as a "fail"—but in this case I wouldn't say it's a bad thing as you didn't have the time to get back to the review. I've closed dozens of GANs when their nominators came back to me and said they didn't have the time to respond. You can always renominate when ready. JAGUAR  17:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mozilla Public License[edit]

The article Mozilla Public License you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Mozilla Public License for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)