User talk:Polgorm

I reverted your edits on Alexandra Isles. If you have concerns, please follow Wikipedia protocol and develop consensus on the talk page with reliable sources.Patapsco913 (talk) 03:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any more disruption and you will be blocked. You are making a mess of the page, removing references and changing text contrary to references. In addition, you have a conflict of interest, which means don't edit the page. Take it to the talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 06:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This is a warning that if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alexandra Isles, you will be blocked from editing. The Isles article page is being watchlisted and vandalism will be detected and reverted on sight. Continued vandalism may require the page to be protected and you will be unable to edit it. Quis separabit? 20:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm ARandomName123. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alexandra Isles without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alexandra Isles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk) 21:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm EternalNub. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

April 2024 #2[edit]

Hello Polgorm. I'm Quaerens-veritatem . Please note the following:
You apparently have an external relationship concerning Alexandra Isles as this is the only article you have edited since 2010 and you have provided edit summaries such as …but it is my life… and Trying to correct information about myself. Who is meddling in my bio?! thus you have a clear and apparent conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
Further, please do not remove content as you repeatedly did at Alexandra Isles. Reviewing your edits shows you only edit Alexandra Isles and continually and improperly remove content. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Your edits are apparent vandalism and, again, have been reverted. Repeated disruptive editing results in the loss of editing privileges.
Thank you for your attention and in advance for your compliance.
Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 00:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Alexandra Isles) for disruptive editing and editing where you have a conflict of interest..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]