User talk:Pooet

Unblock request[edit]

{{unblock|I have freely and openly admitted that I have also edited under Andy14and16. I was not aware that it was illegal to have two accounts on Wikipedia, and I was not using these two accounts for any reasons of "bad faith" or "sock puppetry". Pooet was falsely blocked as a sock-puppet of Dolovis on April 25th (and it has now been long since established, proven, and accepted that this accusation was false and the block on Dolovis has long since been lifted, with apologies). The block against Andy14and16 has been lifted, but I often use public computers and I have a legitimate concern about security, so I want to retain this account as the legitimate alternate account of Andy14and16. Both of my accounts are now properly tagged for legitimate multiple account use. See [1].}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per unblock of main account and open declaration of alternative account on user page.

Request handled by: T. Canens (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

In view of this dicussion and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dolovis/Archive, I believe that this block can be lifted unless there is evidence of actual abuse of multiple accounts. Dolovis seems to be a different person and Andy14and16 is a (now) declared alternate account. I'm asking the blocking admin for input. Sandstein 16:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both Andy14and16 and Pooet have admitted to being the same person, and Andy14and16 has been unblocked. I don't see that this user has any good reason for having the other account unblocked too. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked on the basis of the unblock of the main account; if this declared alternate account is used to violate a policy, we can deal with it then. T. Canens (talk) 22:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]