User talk:Pradeep-Kumar-qr

August 2024

Hello, Pradeep-Kumar-qr. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or for self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to QR code have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: QR code was changed by Pradeep-Kumar-qr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984204 on 2024-08-30T13:19:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at QR code, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Petgoblin (talk) 05:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me whether you have a personal connection to qrcodes.live and are trying to use Wikipedia to publicise or advertise the site, or whether you just think that providing readers of Wikipedia with information on how to use QR codes will be helpful, and that that site is a useful resource. However, whichever of those is the case, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. If it's the first case then you are editing in violation of the policy that Wikipedia is not for promoting, advertising, or publicising anything. If it's the second case then you are editing in violation of the policy that Wikipedia is not a manual or "how to..." guide. In either case you are editing in violation of the policy that article content must have references to reliable sources. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than either creating new articles or adding substantial content to existing ones. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into dong large editing tasks from the start. JBW (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I wrote my message above I had not seen your recent editing of the article Windows Live Barcode. Adding that to the other edits, it is coming to look rather like spam. Please don't add any more links to the same website. Also, when I wrote my message above I forgot to mention that to a large extent your writing has the character of personal essays rather than factual reporting. That personal essay style is appropriate for many publishing platforms, but not for Wikipedia. JBW (talk) 11:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]