User talk:Pradip4india

May 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Unified Payments Interface. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 11:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Pradip4india! Your additions to Waybill have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hut 8.5 19:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Sasihithlu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sasihithlu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  ||  Orbit Wharf 14:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello, I'm Palindromesemordnilap. An edit that you recently made to Adi Kailash seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 20:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sasihithlu

Hello, Pradip4india. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sasihithlu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2023

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Varna (Hinduism), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PepperBeast (talk) 13:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia is consisting many misinformations on Varna Hinduism System, So I am just trying to correct it 🙏 Pradip4india (talk) 14:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is consisting many misinformations on Varna Hinduism System, So I am just trying to correct it Pradip4india (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sudurpashchim Province, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1ee^talk 14:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Listen first of all Om Parvat is not a part of Sudurpashchim Province, Nepal & It lies entirely within Uttarakhand, India... Please look the same in Google Earth App... So I am not vandalizing Wikipedia rather I am eliminating Mis Informations on Wikipedia 🙏 Pradip4india (talk) 14:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

If you look at your edit you'll see that you removed information without explaining why in your edit summary. You also broke the table in the "Mountains" section, suggesting that your edit was vandalism. You must explain your edits to prevent them being misinterpreted. —Bruce1ee^talk 15:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

– robertsky (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)