User talk:Proudyicon
Welcome![edit]
Hi Proudyicon! I noticed your contributions to Tughlaqabad Fort and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! AP 499D25 (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks and I appreciate your greeting Proudyicon (talk) 11:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions[edit]
You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Re Packer&Tracker (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- you made your everyday’s subject the pov push contribution on these three countries historical articles, just for putting your own opinion and pov push with weak citations like fresh published books or books from authors that they only wanted to publish something isn’t really exist, that can’t be a good resource for a big change in the historical topics Proudyicon (talk) 13:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
March 2023[edit]
Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries, as you did to User talk:Proudyicon. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please communicate with civility and refrain from making personal attacks. Why are you accusing another editor of abusing multiple accounts when it appears they have simply lost their password? Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 12:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Justarandomamerican claiming for the authroization of a inactive user may have several other reasons but it can’t proof the ownership of the account and please don’t push your pov and personal opinion to a legitimacy, and also putting a warning for no violation any terms on my t/p is also a quite personal attack Proudyicon (talk) 13:10, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Calling someone who lost their password a sock during a content dispute, seems to me to be casting aspersions. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 13:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Justarandomamerican There is no proof that this user is the original owner of the following user as he claiming, there may be several reasons for inactivity of a user, when someone claims for the authorization of a inactive account with no proof or not even a last password he remembers or no email then this is a good dream for a day. Thanks Proudyicon (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Although there is no proof they own the Packer&Tracker account, it isn't too civil to claim sockpuppetry in an edit summary. Please do not accuse the person of sockpuppetry unless you wish to go to SPI and file a case there. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 13:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Justarandomamerican but this user is very rude, before all of it, this user accused me for the logged out IP sockpuppetry, isn’t it a personal attack? Proudyicon (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Proudyicon: Had I remembered the password of my original account then there was no point for me to creat a new account which prevents me from editing EC protection article. I used to have a email and even used that last year to reset my password. I will be glad to restore my original account.
- Your abusive mannerism isn't very promosing - I disclosed my identity in my very first edit.
- Please stop hounding me and instead respond and clarify on Qutb ud-Din Aybak t/p (with sources) the meaning of title as our body citing Porfessor K. A. Nizami already mentions that the title simply means giver of Lakhs. If you have a reliable source - feel free to discuss on the talk page. Thanks. 16:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC) Re Packer&Tracker (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Justarandomamerican but this user is very rude, before all of it, this user accused me for the logged out IP sockpuppetry, isn’t it a personal attack? Proudyicon (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Although there is no proof they own the Packer&Tracker account, it isn't too civil to claim sockpuppetry in an edit summary. Please do not accuse the person of sockpuppetry unless you wish to go to SPI and file a case there. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 13:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Justarandomamerican There is no proof that this user is the original owner of the following user as he claiming, there may be several reasons for inactivity of a user, when someone claims for the authorization of a inactive account with no proof or not even a last password he remembers or no email then this is a good dream for a day. Thanks Proudyicon (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Calling someone who lost their password a sock during a content dispute, seems to me to be casting aspersions. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 13:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)