User talk:PtAuAg

Welcome

Hello, PtAuAg, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (talk) 19:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, PtAuAg, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! Bkalafut (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet stuff

There's a fair chance that you are truly bewildered by the rash of allegations against you which have been leveled by myself and others. Perhaps it would clear up confusion to know that your pages of interest coincide with a notoriously disruptive former editor. You are free to continue improving these pages as you see fit, but -- in the areas that you've chosen so far -- there may a bit of an adjustment phase as people tune down their "radars". Unfortunately, the disruptions of this former editor have necessitated rather guarded stances to be taken by many people with good intentions, who want to see Wikipedia stay true to its pillars. Most Wikipedians (including even those who have targeted you) generally Assume Good Faith. Unfortunately, you managed to set off a few alerts, which I'm sure will be better-tuned, as needed to accommodate our legitimate editors. BigK HeX (talk) 01:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Most disconcerting. I was nervous initially contributing as there seem to be a lot of rules around editing and then to get all sorts of inconsistent warnings - single purpose account, then 'sockpuppet' accusations - was not a pleasant welcome. Anyway, I will certainly try to keep within the rules and hopefully will only edit when I see something that is definitely worth correcting or commenting upon. Thanks for the proactive stance in explaining what was going on. I must admit I was flummoxed by it. PtAuAg (talk) 05:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karmaisking sock

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Karmaisking (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Reinstate as the checkuser results have come back. LK (talk) 06:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Per the behavioral and technical evidence given at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karmaisking. –MuZemike 21:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]