User talk:Publius Valerius Poplicola

Welcoming Comments from Wikipedians

Hello, Publius Valerius Poplicola, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kardashian

Please don't continue to make edits to Kim Kardashian without getting consensus for your changes on the talk page. Sentences like "In 2007, Kardashian had gained tremendously popular in the United States, of which was due to an allegation that has yet to be proven true, beyond reasonable doubt, of being subjected to an unauthorized pornographic taping that subsequently resulted in court that has yet to be publicly released regarding the verdict, nor has the Kardashian Family offered any clues, or any reliable investigated news gathering from the national media. " are gibberish. The grammar is abysmal and the meaning is extremely unclear. Are you trying to maintain that the existence of the tape is unproven? That the settlement is unproven?

On top of that, what on earth is a "draconian source format"? Again, it's a gibberish phrase that conveys no meaning to either Wikipedia readers or other editors.

At your level of skill with the English language, please get help on the talk page with making your meaning clear before you edit the page again.—Kww(talk) 17:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you edit that page again without gaining input from other editors, I will block you from editing.—Kww(talk) 17:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for apparently lacking competence in English, refusing to discuss edits on talk pages before making edits, and refusing to seek help with edits. Any administrator can unblock this editor when he agrees to discuss changes before making them to get help with the construction of his edits.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 17:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]