Hi, and welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave any questions or comments!

Page Merger

Hi,

I merged the page Absorption (physics) you created into Absorption (electromagnetic radiation) and marked it for deletion. I don't want you to be discouraged by this from other contributions to Wikipedia. Cheers, Samohyl Jan 19:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem.Pyrofork (talk) 04:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Warnings

Hi there. Could you please consider starting user warnings at level 1, or 2, Instead of three? It makes it easier to sufficiently warn users should they need to be reported to WP:AIV. Remember to Assume Good Faith, and Don't bite the newcomers!. Thanks! Dadude3320 01:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Generally I do try to do so. However, when I see repeated vandalism or something obscene I'm inclined not to always "assume good faith." I do, though, see a couple incidents where I was a bit harsh. Thank you for your comment and I will fix these things. Pyrofork (talk) 01:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of warnings

Hello, Pyrofork! On User talk:Claylu, you cannot revert his warning removal. See WP:UP, they can if they want to. Happy editing! Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 17:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry -- my mistake. I was under the impression the rules were the same as for anonymous IPs. Thank you for helping my clarify that! Pyrofork (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks pyrofork. i have my account now and should have no more IP problems —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.116.25 (talk) 09:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - drop by if you have any questions! Pyrofork (talk) 20:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

uc davis SOM

Did as you requested. See new reference. Chyu83

Thank you -- looks good. Pyrofork (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Clair county maps

So long as the map at the top of St. Clair County, Michigan links to Image:Map of Michigan highlighting St. Clair County.svg it can't be deleted. You can check which image it uses by clicking on it in the article. Hope this makes sense. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that -- I didn't meant to change that page. Thought I reverted it back but apparently I didn't.Pyrofork (talk) 00:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UC Davis section capitalization

I have reverted your changes. The MOS is quite explicit and in fact the section is quoted for you right before the title. There is an ongoing discussion on the article talk page and the current consensus is that it should be "Colleges and schools". Please check the talk page before continuing to make the same changes after it has been reverted. Mikemill (talk) 23:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Fox

If there's a reliable source, then add it. A Youtube video posted by zombified1369 is not reliable, no matter what it purports to be a transcript or video of. Too many chances for modification, no way to verify the authorship, no way to verify the integrity. Other sources stand a chance, but not Youtube. Before adding BLP violating material again, discuss your source on the talk page and get approval. Until then, the material is out.—Kww(talk) 03:16, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find a video published by either the Jimmy Kimmel show or the network that broadcasts the Jimmy Kimmel show, yes.—Kww(talk) 03:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piece of Mind

I was not refuting her religion, I was refuting the myspace reference. Mainly, I was refuting the relationship with Shia LaBuff [sic] that people claim to exist, (but it really doesn't.) the use of "her official myspace" was dubious at best. I erased everything that cited that myspace page, but since the odds are she is catholic, i didn't erase it the second time I edited the page, I choose my battles.

Furthermore, she never says in your link that "I AM A CATHOLIC RIGHT NOW," and going to bible camp as a 10 year old does not mean she is now a catholic, in fact in that video it said that camp marked her downward spiral. Given her recent history I would wager that she is now an atheist, there was also an interview I read that said she would ask Megatron to destory the white trash bible belt section of America, but that's neither here nor there.

My beef wasn't with you, it was with an anonymous IP user who thought a fake myspace was her official.

have a nice day WalterWalrus3 (talk) 02:32, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism of user:talk pages

i wasn't aware that leaving a comment on someone's :talk page was considered vandalism. Clown (talk) 03:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

while not logged into my account, i left a comment on another user's talk page that you mistook as vandalism, then you REVERTED HIS TALK PAGE. i know you must troll the recently edited pages or else you wouldn't have seen it; however, i suggest you stick to being a vandalism cop for actual wikipedia ENTRIES (and not talk pages). [user]:talk pages are for users to leave comments to each other. they are not encyclopedia entries, thus you shouldn't have any vested interest in "protecting" them. Clown (talk) 06:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sanfranman59&action=historysubmit&diff=308610779&oldid=308610732 points out the difference between my edit and what you reverted it back to. the point being, this is a user:talk page, designed to facilitate discussion, and does not require your interference. thank you for policing up actual vandalism and your service to the wiki community, but this fight didn't need your involvement. in retrospect, i probably should have formatted my entry on his talk page with a table of contents entry, but i just wanted to get my point across, which is probably why you treated it as vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clown (talk • contribs) 08:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Microsoft Physics Illustrator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microsoft Physics Illustrator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Physics Illustrator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. tlesher (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Pyrofork! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Petershields.jpg

The file File:Petershields.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]