User talk:Qostik

Speedy deletion nomination of Miki Co., LTD

Hello Qostik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miki Co., LTD for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Qostik/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Qostik/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Opencooper (talk) 22:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sheyla Bonnick, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 16:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

East 17

Hello @Qostik, you recently made a few minor changes to the East 17 page, which I reverted as unhelpful. You then proceeded to make the exact same changes, adding the same, unhelpful edit summary. This constitutes not only disruptive editing but also edit warring. Can you please explain? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at East 17. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This is your second warning on this subject. If you can't be bothered to communicate with me about your motives, stop being disruptive, as next time, I will request that your account be blocked. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]