User talk:Qwavel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Speedy deletion of Irving W. Chapley Community Centre[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Irving W. Chapley Community Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 20:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


We have to have certain notability guidelines; otherwise, we'd be swamped under articles about random people and companies who otherwise would be laughed out of an encyclopedia. Please read the notability guidelines. --Golbez (talk) 18:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


if you'e removed someones spam multiple times you should definitely give them a warning. Take a look at WP:UTM. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:37, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Why did you remove my edit in Samsung Galaxy Tab. Don't you imagine that US version (no phone) is the same with other place, therefore the article should also discuss others with phone version. CSL Spice did not reboot when change SIM, so it need to be mentions in Galaxy Tab to highlight the difference. Don't simply revert without giving justifications please. If you have problem with the linkage, just remove the linkage with your personal remarks why you belief it is correct to do so.. Yosri (talk) 14:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

August 2016[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Android Auto, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Please tell me which part of my addition you object to? Which is the 'facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwavel (talkcontribs) 00:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
What are needed are reliable third-party sources (note that message boards and customer forums do not meet Wikipedia's definition of reliable sources). --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 01:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
I see parts of what I wrote that are 'editorializing', so I will remove those, but the core of it is just stating facts - not requiring any research or sources. The citations I use are not meant to have the authority described above because they are not meant to support any opinion or research. But I will try again, so we have a new (and hopefully) better basis for discussion.