Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
An Invite to join the WikiProject Indian Roads
An Invite to join the WikiProject Railways in India
Nomination of Abhirami Anthadhi for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhirami Anthadhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Request to keep the pages
I checked few of the wiki pages , you proposed for deletion.
They are all well defined with fine links.
Few things can be modified and to be updated. It can be done by editors.
- No , those are mere promotions, please understand those ppl are not worth a page in Wikipedia, Wikipedia is not some kinda blog to create pagesR.srinivaas (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
To my Dear Srinivas..
Thanks for your reviews about the un deletion.
I don't understand that how you can say they are not worth for it.
Those pages got more reliable links and sources. It shows they are worth for it.
Wikipedia also keeping it for a long period.
How you can criticis others?
I think you know them personally and taking revenge upon them.
No one can stop, No one Glory.. God can do wonders..
I searched your name in Google... You don't have even a single web page link except Wikipedia user... You alone not a notable person.
Don't under estimate others..
As a frustrated person.. you are trying to degrading others.
Create few wiki pages and support Wikipedia..
If Wikipedia got such a user's like you Wikipedia glory will be degraded..
I think it is better to delete your "User name" and I am also recommending it.
If Wikepedia is having such a blocks and comments definitely , i will put it to you.
- who are you man , do you even understand what wikipedia is ? , i dont have a wikipedia page , i only have a user page ufff....
i dont know any one personally , nothing personal here , you must understand encyclopedia and wikipedia and their purpose i am not against anyone having a wikipageR.srinivaas (talk) 12:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)