User talk:RKO06

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you.

This is your second warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You may be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page may be protected from editing if you do it again.

Your Recent Edits[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Craig Brewster on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Fractions 21:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What, seriously? Take a look at your words used. If you don't want it removed, don't use profanity. --Fractions 21:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you know that I can still see your user name, and I can still see you're vandalism. Keep it up and you'll be blocked. --Fractions 21:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits made since above warnings[edit]

I see you vandalised the Craig Brewster page again. In fact, reviewing all your contributions at [1], the vast majority of them have been vandalism. On the other hand, I see three edits today that do not seem to be vandalism. I'm not sure whether to be sad that you are still at it in spite of all the warnings you have had, or happy that you are branching into making a few decent edits. Isn't the fun of vandalism diluted by the fact that someone (like me) has to clean up the mess afterwards, ensuring your edit is short-lived? Good edits, on the other hand, tend to persist and are more likely still to be there the next time you look. Just a thought I wanted to share with you.

Obviously you are skirting very close to getting a ban at the moment though, so be careful. --Guinnog 15:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:RKO06, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Andeh 18:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the relevant policy [2]. --Guinnog 18:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Ian Manka Talk to me! 19:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to World Wrestling Entertainment[edit]

Your recent edit to World Wrestling Entertainment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guinnog 18:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 48 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 18:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 18:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why have I been banned?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RKO06 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't feel as if I have done anything wrong, can you please explain?

Decline reason:

Clear vandalism

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Diffs like this, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=England&diff=prev&oldid=66000046 vandalising user pages, plus the fact you have a record of poor edits. Sit it out, try to do better next time. --Guinnog 18:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]