User talk:ROBERT TAGGART

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 15:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ROBERT TAGGART (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why the block ? What multiple abuses ? As one uses a 'communal' computer does this block apply to all of its users ?

Decline reason:

This simply refers to your own inappropriate edits while logged out. More information is available at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ROBERT TAGGART/Archive. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock | As one has not 'logged out' when editing this must have been done by someone else. As previously mentioned - one uses a 'communal' computer - their be many other users. We do discuss 'issues' arising from various sites. One knows of three other users who have a 'disdain' for 'wiki' and some (always faceless) editors. Whilst oneself may disagree with their 'tactics', their sentiment be shared ! ROBERT TAGGART (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLOCKED OR UNBLOCKED

This be no problem... one could live without 'wiki' ! Could the multiple abuses simply refer to our ongoing 'battle of wills' with two or three editors concerning two or three articles ? (Derby, Derby Cathedral, Spondon). Looking down 'history' option it would appear moi be not the only such 'will' ! Cheers !

AN/I notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ROBERT TAGGART. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]