User talk:RYard

Welcome!

Hello, RYard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

V. Molotov

16:05, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Forgotten Realms warnings

I checked to try and see where the decision was made to add these warnings, but could not find it. While they might be standard on Forgotten Realms articles, adding such warnings is not common practice on Wikipedia, and I have not seen similar ones on any of the other hundreds of fictional universes we cover. Wikipedia guielines have long been quite clear that the warning that an article is on a fictional topic should be integrated into the prose, and this is the consensus view on the Wikipedia talk:Check your fiction|talk page. Wikipedia:Fiction and WikiProject Fictional series have both long worked under these guidelines. - SimonP 19:32, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten Realms template

Hello,

Thanks for all,

For Fallen Kingdom(s), you mayvery well be right, I have almost no information except a rapid reading of Lost Empires of Faerûn and the page about Lost Kingdoms and Crown Wars.

For the template, I'm stuck, I can't find the way we are supposed to enter variables (like the name of the capitals). Please answer on the talk page of the index. Reply to David Latapie 12:44, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should also add yourself as a participant. Could you also support me with this proto-edit war? Reply to David Latapie 13:58, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten Realms infobox

Hi,

I have a problem with the infobox. I think this is a problem of rows and clomns but can't say for sure. Check the discussion (and reply there, please so that newer particpants can help). Thank you Reply to David Latapie

FR Template Box

Hi,

It also took me quite a time to find it.

The textbox is a template. That is, every thing that is entered here will be duplicated everywhere
Variables must be added in the core of the article

A picture is worth a thousand words:

Text box

! Name the must appear as the section name
| {{{name that identify the value}}}
|- 
! Section
| {{{some_name}}}
|- 
! Capital
| {{{capital}}}
|- 
! Ruler
| {{{ruler}}}
|-

Article

{{Infobox Forgotten Realms Countries |
name that identify the value = value
some_name = bla
country = Cormyr |
image = [[Image:Cormyr.jpg|thumb|Map of Cormyr]] |
capital = Suzail |
ruler = Azoun Ⅴ (infant) |
}}

I will revert changes on the infobox. You will then just have to compare difference to have a confirmation of how it works.

Please tell me whether or not it helped you. If you understood with this explanation, I plan to put it on the FR Wikiproject page. Reply to David Latapie, 00:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Forgotten Realms request on wizards.com

Hi,

I just posted a request for assistance for anyone interested on the WotC forum. Just so you might be interested to know - and maybe to participate.

Address is http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=712010.

Have a nice day
David Latapie (✒ | @) 12:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms

Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Forgotten Realms during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gavin Collins (talk) 08:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dragonspear Castle

The article Dragonspear Castle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dragonspear Castle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragonspear Castle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonspear Castle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 13:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Secomber

The article Secomber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of High Moor

The article High Moor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daggerford

The article Daggerford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 23:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Daggerford" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Daggerford has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Daggerford until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 02:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Secomber" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Secomber has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Secomber until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 02:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]