User talk:Radr4life21
Tedder and/or DanParker89, I am not familiar with wikipedia, so I don't know how to navigate to discussion boards and post things. Everytime I click on "talk", it just sends me to a page...I would love to respond to you and get you the evidence you need but again, I have NO clue how to navigate through wiki. Is it because I am blocked? Not sure why this is so difficult. I looked everywhere for a "reply" link, or "post" link, no where to be found. There are some "edit" links, but that does me no good. Hopefully you will get this asap. Please email me at Radr4life21@yahoo.com to we can settle this dispute as professionals. Thanks.
Radr4Life- if you can't figure out things on Wikipedia, and not the least is that there is no dispute here, then you are probably not meant to edit here at Wikipedia. There is no 'reply' system in the sense that you are referring to. As long as you are blocked, and you are indefinitely because not only did you edit war, but while blocked created a sock-puppet account. And even when I spelled out EXACTLY what you needed to do when you returned from being blocked, you came back and did the same thing again. And thus the indef block.
I tell you below EXACTLY what you need to do to get your block lifted. Don't want to do it? Oh well. And I told you exactly why your edit won't go in. Don't want to listen? Fine, have fun. Danparker89 (talk) 18:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
August 2012[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Troy High School (California). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. If you provided reliable sources for your edit, and/or discussed it to achieve consensus on the talk page, it might be received better. tedder (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. tedder (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey genius, get your facts straight. Are you aware of the FACT Mr Rose agreed to a settlement in May of 2012? Are you aware that he was awarded thousands of dollars? I'm reporting FACTS, and you keep deleting them then abusing your status by blocking me for reporting FACTS. Proving that Wikipedia is a joke. I am a source close to Mr Rose and his family, do I need to find his settlement agreement papers and email them over to you in order for you to report the truth and stop blocking me!?? Again, send me both of your emails and I will have that to you promptly.
Take it to the Troy High School Talk Page[edit]
Mr Parker or Mr Tedder, is there a phone number I can reach you at, or an email address? I would like to resolve this ASAP, this is tedious and not right.
Well, I'd tell you to post a source, but you already tried without it, so have fun creating a new account. So you know, they can trace IP numbers so if you create a new account and go back to what you are doing, they are going to ban you under the sock puppet rule. You need a acceptable source to post that, and even if you find one, I don't think it is notable enough to warrant inclusion. And the only way you can know any of this is if you are Geno Rose himself. Wikipedia does not exist to post your spin on something. It is what it is. 99.186.22.249 (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I'd tell you go to the Troy High School talk page, but it's too late for that now anyway. So you know, even if you create another sock puppet they are going to track it back to you anyway and block it again. And they can also protect the page where no edits can be made to it, which will probably happen if you don't stop edit warring on it. like the guy above said, even if you find an acceptable source I don't think it will be notable enough to warrant inclusion. Danparker89 (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. tedder (talk) 14:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Radr4life21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
the edits I am making are FACTS, yet I'm being blocked for them. If you need documentation, please provide me email address(s) and I will gladly send those over to you promptly. Radr4life21 (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're blocked (again) for edit warring, not the contents or validity of your edits. --jpgordon::==( o ) 01:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This message is intended for Tedder
Hey genius, get your facts straight. Are you aware of the FACT Mr Rose agreed to a settlement in May of 2012? Are you aware that he was awarded thousands of dollars? I'm reporting FACTS, and you keep deleting them then abusing your status by blocking me for reporting FACTS. Proving that Wikipedia is a joke. I am a source close to Mr Rose and his family, do I need to find his settlement agreement papers and email them over to you in order for you to report the truth and stop blocking me!?? Again, send me both of your emails and I will have that to you promptly.
Read the guide to appealing blocks[edit]
Nuff said. You obviously don't seem to read any of the linked sources that Wikipedia offers to users, be it on Edit Warring, Notability, or acceptable sources, but please do so. There is nothing to resolve between you and Tedder & I. Either get with Wikipedia policies or don't. Danparker89 (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Tedder & DanParker89 Hey genius, get your facts straight. Are you aware of the FACT Mr Rose agreed to a settlement in May of 2012? Are you aware that he was awarded thousands of dollars? I'm reporting FACTS, and you keep deleting them then abusing your status by blocking me for reporting FACTS. Proving that Wikipedia is a joke. I am a source close to Mr Rose and his family, do I need to find his settlement agreement papers and email them over to you in order for you to report the truth and stop blocking me!?? Again, send me both of your emails and I will have that to you promptly.
Additionally....[edit]
Please stop asking us to email you for your evidence. It's not going to happen, not the least is that it is not an acceptable source here for wikipedia. If you think whatever you have will make any difference, it won't. That's not how it works here. Danparker89 (talk) 00:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DUI Dodger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, DUI Dodger[edit]
Hello Radr4life21. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled DUI Dodger.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DUI Dodger}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)