User talk:Recordstraight1234

April 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Furnace Mountain. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dae Gak with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 20:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Furnace Mountain with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dan653 (talk) 20:53, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dae Gak, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. City Of Silver 16:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War[edit]

April 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history at Dae Gak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tao2911 (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jikaku (talk) 16:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

There is a sockpuppet investigation involving you here.Tao2911 (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]