Jump to content

User talk:Reczekgl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Reczekgl, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have an overdue training assignment.

[edit]

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Eejoyce66 (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

Hi Grace! It's Georgia.

I thought I'd just list any minor edits/suggestions I have here. :) Feel free to do the same in my talk page.

1. You might want to add in some more citations. They don't necessarily need to be different sources, but I can't always find where you're getting your information. Ex: "Theophanu was not the blue-blood or purple-born princess the Ottonians would have preferred; in fact, as the Saxon chronicler Bishop Thietmar of Merseburg, writes, the Ottonian preference was Anna Porphyrogenita, a daughter of late Emperor Romanos II."

2. I'd do another grammar read through -- I found a number of run on sentences. Nothing that makes it unreadable, but it might clearer if you broke them up. The last sentence of the marriage section is slightly confusing. I might simplify it a little bit to make it more clear that it's Otto's need for an heir sealed the deal on the marriage.

Other than that, it looks really solid. You do a very good job of remaining neutral and your prose seem to be solid to me. :) It's clear and academic, but not so much so that it's unreadable. If you have a chance, you might ask the talk page is you can remove the banners saying that there are not any citations, since you've fixed that. Armitagegr (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]