User talk:Rengrutrial
AfC notification: Draft:Josh Littlejohn has a new comment
[edit]
- Thank you, DGG for the comment. I will try to improve it but I am bit confused here. Another editor Praxidicae has declined it because of notability concerns. He wrote "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" but some of the sources I added have significant coverage and as per the rules, he has received a well-known and significant honor. Can you please clarify if it meets the notability criteria of Wikipedia or not?
AfC notification: Draft:Josh Littlejohn has a new comment
[edit]- I'mwaiting for thedoctorate, because that essentiall is strong evidence towards notability DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- DGG, I have already added sources for the doctorates. Please see[1], [2]. I will greatly appreciate if you kindly accept the article now because it passes the WP:BIO. --Rengrutrial (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- @DGG: were you able to check the new sources please? Rengrutrial (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- DGG, I have already added sources for the doctorates. Please see[1], [2]. I will greatly appreciate if you kindly accept the article now because it passes the WP:BIO. --Rengrutrial (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'mwaiting for thedoctorate, because that essentiall is strong evidence towards notability DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- I clarified, and accepted. DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I greatly appreciate it. --Rengrutrial (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Littlejohn has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 02:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Randi Shinder
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Randi Shinder, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TAXIDICAE💰 15:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Rengrutrial. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)