User talk:Rflejeune

This is Rflejeune's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Major cleanup underway at Kayastha; your help would be appreciated

Greetings, I'm doing a major chop on Kayastha, removing caste puffery, adding proper citations about the controversy of their varna designation, and generally trying to hack out unref, OR, and other unsuitable materials. If you have any chance at all to chip in, it'd be greatly appreciated. Likewise, even watchlisting and keeping an eye out for upset editors removing my (full footnoted) notations about their possible Shudra status (an unpopular topic) would be appreciated. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, totally up to you. But definitely Watchlisting it to watch for angry IPs reverting my footnotes to add pseudo-history would help a ton. After that, the "Varna controversy" section could use any GoogleBooks info you can dig up about the many court cases the Kayastha had trying to argue which varna they should fall under with the British. Likewise, most of the "History" section and the whole "Culture" section are uncited junk that needs to be re-written based on citeable works. Out of curiosity, are you familiar with http://reftag.appspot.com ? It's an auto-formatter to turn the URL of any GoogleBooks page into a proper WP footnotes. Awesome tool, changed my whole wiki-life. Thanks for any help you can provide! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited Ellis Credle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George S. Elrick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George S. Elrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George S. Elrick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]