User talk:RichardDHeath

Welcome!

Hello, RichardDHeath, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Megalithic yard

Sorry to great you like this, but there were several problems. First, as the author of the article, you really shouldn't be adding it to articles but should suggest it on the talk page. Secondly, it doesn't seem to meet our criteria at WP:RS or WP:SPS. It also probably fails WP:UNDUE (sorry for all the acronyms, just click on them to see what they mean. Now if someone like Clive Ruggles writes about your idea, then it could probably go in the article as that would boost what we call its 'significance'. Any further discussion should go at the article talk page rather than here or on my page to keep it more open. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Doug, Thanks for your welcome, however great! I have uploaded three sections to the Talk area to see if people object and why. You will see they belong there even if the megalithic yard is officially case closed. The truncation of historical development on Wikipedia over what have been controversial subjects, claimed to be closed by certain academic interests, removes the integrity of the cumulative wisdom over the years that is real in its own right and useful for anyone knowing what has been tried and why it eventually failed to be accepted. Where on Wikipedia, are reasons given by "leading academics" about why the megalithic yard is definitively an incorrect conjecture? ~~RichardDHeath~~

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Megalithic Yard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• author=John Ivimy|title=The Sphinx and the Megaliths, p. 132|year=1974|publisher=Turnstone}}</ref>), see figure below.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)