User talk:Ritenhouse
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Ritenhouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vasily Anisimov did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. — MarkH21talk 12:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Daily Mail reference at Ian Cobain
[edit]Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Ian Cobain. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi User:Robby.is.on - whilst I understand wiki has a blanket ban on the Mail, in this instance the ban doesn't seem a very nuanced approach given the quotation is from an interview, the interview was conducted by a shortlisted interview journalist at the National Press Awards and the whole page suffers from an over-reliance from material from one newspaper - the Guardian.
- But I don't want to make waves, so have changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritenhouse (talk • contribs) 20:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for replacing the Daily Mail reference. The DM has a history of fabricating quotes so we shouldn't trust them to quote people accurately. If the quote has any relevance (WP:DUE) it should be covered by other, more reliable news sources.
- I agree the sourcing could be more varied. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Rachel Cook
[edit]Gentle reminder: Talk:Rachel Cooke exists. Kleuske (talk) 08:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)