User talk:Rmic2167
Welcome!
Hello, Rmic2167, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Crittercam- penguin.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Crittercam- penguin.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Crittercam- penguin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit]Your addition to Crittercam has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/15/technology/reality-tv-takes-a-twist-as-a-kingdom-bares-its-secrets.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm Whpq (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
[edit]Your addition to Crittercam has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 'Copied from http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/crittercam-about/' Cresix (talk) 19:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
References in Crittercam
[edit]You added a number of references that only contain an EBSCO link and no bibliographic information. This way, these references are useless to anyone other than you (and perhaps even yourself now), as we have no way to identify the source you had been looking at. Please take a look and fix these links accordingly. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)