User talk:Roccobattaglia

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vintagekits 01:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Roccobattaglia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 16:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bobby Sands, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 16:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warnnings

Do not remove warnings from your talk page. {subst:test1a-n| Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to [[: ]], you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 21:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

The next time you blank this page, I will ask for a block on you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 21:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please reconsider your behavior once the block expires.

I have not vandalised. I was only removing vandalism from my talk page. --Roccobattaglia 21:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop disrupting Wikipedia by adding spurious vandalism warnings to other editors' talk pages, and making spurious vandalism reports merely to prove a point. Thank you. Demiurge 21:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Removing warnings is considered vandalism. Don't do it. ♥ Fr ed il 21:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:VAND, incorrect warnings are not vandalism. If you think they have been placed in error, it is better to engage in a productive discussion than to just remove them for no reason, as that is considered vandalism. ♥ Fr ed il 21:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism, eh? ♥ Fr ed il 22:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down

You seem to be here solely to disrupt. Now start doing something positive or you'll be blocked from editing. Thanks Glen 21:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you removed warnings from your page (repeatedly) then made accusations of vandalism on various other editors pages (I suggest you read WP:VAN first) then reported them to WP:AIV and havent done one thing I would consider productive. So start. Glen 21:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Please note that removing warnings from your Talk page is a) useless because they exist in the edit history and b) vandalism as they were left here by editors with good reason. Please also note that reporting editors to WP:AIV without good reason and without having issued a level 4 warning is also considered an abuse of editing, as you are trying to make a point, which is not what Wikipedia is about - this is a collaborative project based upon mutual trust and encouragement. Please calm down and add something useful - either content, reliable sources, citations, references or assistance at the Help and Reference Desks. You will be blocked for any further vandalism. (aeropagitica) 21:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

Glen 22:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]