User talk:Ronaldwolf

Citation tool

Thank you for creating the S100A15 article!

In case you haven't seen this yet, please check out User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool (instructions). Given a PubMed ID, one can quickly produce a full citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. This may save you a lot of work. If you want to include the citation "in-line", be sure that the "add ref tag" option of the template tool is turned on. If you want to include a reference in the further reading section, the "add ref tag" option should be left off. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 19:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your suggestions. It will make citations easier. Do I have to change the current ones accordingly? Ronaldwolf

Strictly speaking, no. However I took the liberty of reformatting the citations. In a somewhat related issue, the currently approved Hugo Gene symbol and recommended UniProt name for S100A15 are S100A7A and S100 calcium binding protein A7A (Q86SG5) respectively. Would you have any objections if the S100A15 article were renamed S100A7A? Boghog (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, S100A15 (Koebnerisin)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, S100A15 (Koebnerisin). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – S100A15. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at S100A15 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Hannibal21 (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)