User talk:Rpatungan
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University,_East_Bay/Medical_Humanities_(Fall_2017). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Rpatungan, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review for AIDS Article[edit]
Peer review of Slava Mogutin edits:
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
The added information seems relevant, but the wording is a bit confusing - specifically "Lost Boys is credited to his return". I'm can guess at what the sentence means, but you might be able to reword it to make it easier to read.
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
The edits appear to be neutral, though it could possibly be seen as one-sided with the verbiage "Lost Boys is credited...". However, no heavy biases evident.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
The edits are pretty neutral, so no over- or underrepresented viewpoints.
- Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
The "Red Scare" reference looks to be duplicated (1 and 4 are the same).
- Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
Additions are properly cited from "Red Scare".
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
Could add more under "Contemporary Exhibitions" if there were new exhibits since 2014, but otherwise, information seems to be up to date.