User talk:Rusirascal

Welcome!

Hello, Rusirascal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Fullstop (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

Rusi, please review the copyright notices at the images you uploaded. Those images are in fact not yet in the "Public domain." Even for Image:Adnan.jpg this will happen in 2045 at the earliest (if you continue to invoke US PD law). You may wish to tag them with {{db-author}} before someone else tags them as copyright violations. -- Fullstop (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ASUS Eee PC

Well done for finding the reference, I thought there must be one but couldn't find it myself. Can I make one small request, please add a short summary of your edits so that other editors can see your intent. Thanks again --Brian R Hunter (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can I do that? Rusirascal (talk) 13:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you did put a link up for me..... :-) Rusirascal (talk) 13:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Sam manekshaw.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sam manekshaw.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Adnan.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Adnan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 07:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Jrd and rats.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation, Image:Jrd and rats.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Jrd and rats.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Jrd and rats.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Jrd and rats.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Jrd and rats.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hi, I nominated File:Ratan d tata.jpg and File:Jrd and rats.jpg for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Your recent editing history at Devyani Khobragade incident shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- John Reaves 06:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aashish Contractor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aashish Contractor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aashish Contractor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a few days to complete the said article, then you may decide.

Thanks

Rusirascal (talk) 11:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]