User talk:Russkiypimp

Welcome!

Hello, Russkiypimp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Norman Lieska

A tag has been placed on Norman Lieska, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Simply being a university professor is not, in itself, Notable. -- Fan-1967 20:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University of Illinois College of Medicine copyright problems

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the University of Illinois College of Medicine article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. (Comparison page was [1]) --Closeapple 07:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Seung Hui-Cho

Thank you for spending your time and efforts to add to the article Seung-Hui Cho.

However, the source (which appears to me to be an editorial) that you provided to support the revisions to the article does not mention a clinical diagnosis as part of the official, ongoing investigation. Other than the document for the December 13, 2005 mental health evaluation that pointed to the need for hospitalization (the document does not mention for what mental health condition), no other medical, autopsy or toxicology information has been released from any of the medical facilities (including Cook Counseling Center on the Virgina Tech campus) as to a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other mental health diagnosis.

Since you alluded to schizophrenia as a diagnosis, do you have a verifiable source (for example, public or private physician, hospital, medical examiner comments with direct medical knowledge or direct contact with Seung-hui Cho) that disseminated or briefed the media with the schizophrenia diagnosis? The mention in the article that "Cho was not only paranoid, he was also schizoid" fails to satisfy this condition because the comments were made by writer of the article/editorial -- a writer who does not hold himself out as a medical professional with direct (or even indirect) of Cho's mental health or medical condition. The comment "paranoid" and "schizoid" is simply an unsubstantiated point of view (POV).

The sentence "It is believed that Cho suffered from a Cluster A (Odd-Eccentric) Personality Disorder, possibly Schizoid or Paranoid Personality Disorder" is considered original research, since this information has not released by medical professionals or facilities who have direct knowledge of Cho's mental or medical health. The sentence "Some think he suffered from Paranoid Schizophrenia" also contains weasel words to avoid attribution to direct the source of the schizophrenia diagnosis. Examples in your sentence include "It is believed..." (in other words, who or what believes?) and "Some think" (who thinks?) does not tell the reader where the information came from. For encyclopedia articles, Wikipedia requires attribution for a statement based on a verifiable, reliable and authoritative source of the information (in this case, a verifiable, reliable and authoritative source for Cluster A (Odd-Eccentric) Personality Disorder or schizophrenia diagnosis).

In the meantime, I would have to tag your contribution in the article to get opinions from other editors of the article as to the inclusion of this information. lwalt 00:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nicole Lapin

An editor has nominated Nicole Lapin, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Lapin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cicada emerging.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cicada bush0001.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cicadas climbing.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]