User talk:Ruudisoc

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)[edit]

Hello, Ruudisoc, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rudi Vansnick[edit]

Hi - I note that you have contributed the article Rudi Vansnick. However, having noted your Wiki editors name tag, I believe you are Rudi Vansnick. Can you please confirm you are Rudi Vansnick? If yes as I suspect, then unfortunately the article Rudi Vansnick needs to be removed, as a self-written biography breaks Wikipedia's rules on neutrality - see WP:NPOV. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very straneg, you prefer having strangers talking about certain other persons in stead of having the person posting the correct and only information about his person. So, I just have to ask some one else to drop in the article and it's ok. I can prove several sites and organisations can state my personal CV. So what's next to do ? Rudi Vansnick - President ISOC Belgium —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruudisoc (talk • contribs) 22:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are clear rules on the writing of a biography of any person - see WP:BIO. In summary, the rule accepts the proposal that the writer of their own bio would have a biased opinion, and hence the rule. Secondly, the references applied to the biography of Rudi Vansnick were self-referenced to things he had written himself, which broke rules on references - see WP:REF. Thirdly, even putting those issues aside, the deletion record and debate shows that in the opinion of various Wikipedia editors, there was insufficient reference-able evidence to prove notability of Rudi Vansnick, and hence no need for an article on Wikipedia even if it was rewritten. The article was hence deleted under Wikipedia's rules. If you had felt differently, you could have added to the debate at the time - I have in the past saved self-written bio articles. But in this case there was no input from yourself, and in light of the lack of suitable third party references, presently seems no need for such an article. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 14:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]