User talk:Ryulong/Archive 48

Archive 45

Archive 46

Archive 47

Archive 48

Archive 49

Archive 50

→

Archive 55

Changeman Article

Re-read the Manual of Style on this point. You are not interpreting correctly. And don't delete this message because we'll need to show our interaction to the mediators, eventually.

If you think the "See Also" section applies to the template below it, you need to make that uniform on the other sentai articles. You are mistakenly removing a valid link that isn't spam. So go ahead and report me. I'll counter-report you. You allow fansites on other tokusatsu articles. Be consistent and impartial.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Delaluz (talk • contribs)

All fansites have been removed and the "see also" section only exists on articles where there are no external links. That is consistent. Stop adding it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

You're missing the point. Those fansites are allowed because of an exception to the fansite guideline in the Manual of Style -- re-read it.

Re: "See Also" -- you are being inconsistent with other Wikipedia articles. The "preceded by/succeeded by" template does not go under "See Also" but stands alone. E.g., see the Cardinal James Gibbons article.Delaluz (talk) 20:55, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

There are to be no fansites on any tokusatsu articles. This was decided a while ago and some obviously fell through the cracks. Also, we are not using Shougo B'stard's site because of an argument that he believes that we were violating his copyright, when it is very possible he was violating ours.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

LMAO -- you quote his site verbatim, then accuse him of plagiarizing? Stop deleting my messages as we'll need them for arbitration.Delaluz (talk) 21:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

His website came online the exact same time that the information was added to Wikipedia. ANd problem solved, now there are no character biographies on the Changeman page. So piss off.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

His site went live months before his content appeared on the article. Why you would you rather annihilate the page than credit a source? It looks like a vendetta.Delaluz (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Because it's still copyvio.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Coro-Coro leaks

Might be a good idea to keep an extra eye out on Pokémon since there's been a Coro-Coro leak about the new games. Hopefully it won't be long until it's legitimately released. Melicans (talk, contributions) 21:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

The issue comes out on Saturday, so we only have to wait till then.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

You might want to step in the discussion at List of Pokemon and at the entry on WP:RFPP; I'm at my limit. Melicans (talk, contributions) 22:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I've made my statements.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Cheers; with luck there were won't be too many more instances of the additions. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Diendriver

How was that original research? He uses the Diendriver as a gun in his human form all the time, which is unique compared to most Riders who can only use any of their abilities in their Rider form and the section doesn't even mention he can just use it as a regular gun, which he does often. I don't see how that's Original Research. Please explain. Godzillawolf (talk) 16:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

If it is not stated directly by the source material, it is original research.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

TF Animated robots

IP 173.50.61.111 has been reverting katakana after I warned him repeatly to stop. Can we place the page on semi-protection? Fractyl (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Katakana isn't fucking necessary for an American TV series.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

AtoZ

Kamen Rider Joker & Cross Counter Punch and the memory slots are clearly visible [1] [2]. Xtreme2010 ( ~AlienX2009~ ) 02:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

"Cross Counter Punch" is the name of a general attack. It's not referred to as his Maximum Drive. And those 26 Maximum Slots are not mentioned in the text.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

NascaJoker. Xtreme2010 ( ~AlienX2009~ ) 18:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Terrible photoshop, unlike this which is a decent photoshop.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Fine, just tell me if it is real or not. Xtreme2010 ( ~AlienX2009~ ) 23:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

THERE WILL NEVER BE A NASCA MEMORY FOR KAMEN RIDER DOUBLE.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

2011 Power Rangers season

Don't you think it is time we start working on an article for the 2011 Power Rangers season? While the name of the season hasn't been announced yet, the Ranger names have been announced according to this article: [3]

A possible idea would be have the article located at Power Rangers (2011) for now. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 22:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Linearranger is not a reliable source. MMPR is going to continue airing through 2011. We don't have a title. And all of the information relevant to the upcoming show which we don't know when it's coming out is perfectly fine located in the main Power Rangers page. There is only one reliable source anyway.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Table Headders Respone

Sorry Ryu, I thought they both looked funny so I fixed them. Didn't realized they were meant to look that way. Sorry again Ryu.--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

re: Flow

Other that simple consistency? Why use Flow throughout the entire article (save for a note in the lead), except only in the infobox? Don't make it confusing. Just because something isn't explicitly stated doesn't mean you should do it; it's common sense.--十八 20:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

No. Because something isn't explicitly forbidden means I am allowed to do it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)