User talk:SFH

Welcome!

Hello, SFH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 16:32, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've seen you are working on Stargate articles a lot. Keep up the good work :-) --Tone 23:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wookieepedia

Hello! I am Patricknoddy from Wookieepedia. How fun it is to have accounts on Wookiee and Wikipedia. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 22:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Wookipedian!

Hello SFH! You are an administrator in Wookipedia, right? I am wookipedian too (and now new wikipedian!). DARTH SIDIOUS2 09:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SFH. You probobly won't recognize my sig, but I'm General Grham on wookieepedia. I saw what you said on the talk page for DiNozzo so I was wondering if you were an NCIS fan. If so go here. It can use all the help it can get.Mooapau ^{Talk to Me} 11:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey as an admin of the website do you get paid for blocking, deleting and reverting? Its obviously important to get cash due to the worst part in your life the electric bill.(76.211.140.155 (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

American Dad

You've seemed to contribute meaningful info to the American Dad Pages, so head on over to http://americandad.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page and see if you can help out, thanks Grande13 05:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Samos (Jak and Daxter)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Samos (Jak and Daxter), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Samos (Jak and Daxter) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Samos (Jak and Daxter), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Side of the Force

Should I tell you that Anakin is not a Sith Lord and neither Cade nor Luke?? Only Maul, Sidious and Tyrannus turned into sith lords. Anakin, Cade and Luke turned into Dark Jedi when seduced not sith lords. The Dark Jedi are stronger than sith lords. Also Star Destroyers are only used by the Imperials not the Rebels and those guys think the Rebels Stole some and add them to their arsenal when they become the New Republic.(76.211.140.155 (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I'd tell you to go to Wookieepedia, but I also suspect that you'd be banned for original research and/or vandalism within your first three edits. -- SFH (talk) 21:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looked there and done that but it said nothing over there due to Starwarsfanboy keeps on removing text on the Dark Jedi, Star Destroyer and Sith pages. Also some guy thinks that Star Destroyers were captured by the Alliance after Endor and the worst part the user thinks there are New Republic Star Destroyers when the Venators and the Old Republic were abandoned and dead. Also the Jedi did not have any missile at all just lightsabers and some moron put on the missile page that Jedi owns a missile.(76.211.140.155 (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

It's called the Expanded Universe. And it's canon according to Lucasfilm. -- SFH (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Telepathy

Telepathy is evil due to the following reasons.

Telepathy can only be used by aliens without a mouth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.211.140.155 (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Last time telepathy was used it was used by evil sith
last time it happened heres what happened. His thoughts I know what they are planning to do. The aliens are like Locusts they are moving from planet to planet and consume every natural resourse they find and when they did they move on and were next. Nuke em. Nuke the Bastards.

See? I told you only evils used Telepathy.

(76.211.140.155 (talk) 20:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Sith

Well at least sith can only appear two at a time at least due to Sidious and tyranas and its not like they can be at least billions of them right? The guys think the Rebel Alliance can capture Star Destroyers and there will be ever New Republic star Destroyers(Star Destroyers that served the New republic).(76.211.140.155 (talk) 21:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]