User talk:SP013/Archives/2020/July

Cobra (2020 film)

Referring to you edits. Let me tell you that you cannot remove sourced and valid information from the section. Also, the explanation for your edits is not justified. Please discuss here what is the issue? Arjann (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

@Arjann: I was trimming down the music section because section i removed was just describing the song which I felt was not needed and I also replaced the infobox and tracklisting like normal movie articles have. You have added a singles infobox on a film’s page when the infobox has to be a infobox soundtrack and then I added a tracklisiting for future songs.SP013 (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

You cannot remove information that is sourced and relevant. Right now there is no standalone film soundtrack, hence information disseminated and very well complies with infobox here. We cannot take a call on future songs. Let the official listing come. Arjann (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok thank you for replying but also I was looking at a few other films without any songs that were released such as Atrangi Re which has an Infobox album without any singles. I also saw that films such as Bhaagamathie and Raju Gari Gadhi 2 have no more than a single (with the exception of the theme song in Bhaagamathie) and yet they still have a tracklisting and infobox album. SP013 (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Radhe Shyam#Original languages

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Radhe Shyam#Original languages. Is Radhe Shyam shot in Tamil as well? Ab207 (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Just a thought

Hey there, re: this, just a thought: It's a bit difficult to keep track of where all the different arguments have been made. My hope for creating the reset section was to start a fresh discussion, so continuing a discussion high up on the page from two days ago might not be the best approach. Further, I've asked the other user twice to clarify their position, and if they are watching the page, then they know we are waiting. If they don't want to bother clarifying, that's their choice, and if consensus doesn't see things their way, they won't be able to stonewall the change. Obviously you can do whatever you want, but I just wanted to express how I normally treat these situations. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Yea I agree it would be nice if we get a new section that clearly specifies how the article is not POV and etc. SP013 (talk) 16:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Janata Garage

Hey mate, I reverted your edit to Janata Garage poster. I'm not sure if you have noticed but it says "2 days to go," which may not be desirable. I suggest you to find a poster with release date on it. On a side note, I don't think there's really a need for find a replacement as the earlier one works fine (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). Thanks! -- Ab207 (talk) 17:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ab207: Thank you for giving a valid reason as to why you changed it back. However I have a question. For Jai Lava Kusa, I added a poster that fit the theme and it had the release date but an editor reverted it back stating that it has the 3 leads but as you said it had 5 days which was not desirable. SP013 (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

May be its because the three leads poster also has release date on it. But still having "X days to go" is not desirable because its anachronistic. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)