User talk:Samantha of Cardyke

Welcome!

Hello, Samantha of Cardyke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --S iva1979^{Talk to me}13:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish notice board

Have you visited the Scottish Wikipedians' notice board yet?--Mais oui! 12:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting the Health Board areas on the UK hospitals page. I started yesterday and then completely forgfot. Are Shetland and Orkney separate Health Boards from mainland?--Mais oui! 10:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the "inuse" template at very top. Please do not edit untril I remove it. Ta.--Mais oui! 11:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God, I really didn't mean it to sound quarrelsome. I guess I just come over that way a lot!

Just put this template at the top, but only if you are doing a lot of work: {{inuse}}. --Mais oui! 11:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right, on you go now. By the way, I think that the order should be Eng, Scot, Wales, NI, but heck, it ain't that critical.--Mais oui! 12:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colour scheme

Please feel free to work on List_of_post_towns_in_the_United_Kingdom - there's plenty of room for everyone. I've being using this task to find dab pages in need of attention. I'm afraid I don't have the technical knowledge to comment on your colour scheme suggestion - you could suggest it on a technical forum to find out if it is practical. CarolGray 17:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NHS

I appreciate your efforts to try to get these started but starting them as requests isn't really the way to do it. you may as well just stub them and place the expand tags in the pages ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 17:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- I've started to expand some of these articles, and have created an "{{NHS Scotland}}" template for navigation purposes. Thunderwing 22:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uncategorized pages

Work on picking out living people. Samantha of Cardyke (talk) 18:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable names

Hi, Samantha. I appreciate that you have added names at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biographies, but I'm uncertain about your intentions for dropping this long list into the Non-Notable category. This category is for names that should be deleted. With just a quick search on only a few of those names, I could identify them and their notability. (see Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biographies#From NNDB (www.nndb.com) (need to verify notability). I think it would be great if you could simply check out the names yourself with a google search, add identification and a source, and then place them in a category. That way, these won't be simply deleted as unidentified. Thanks and cheers. — CactusWriter | ^needles 16:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trilogy ring listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trilogy ring. Since you had some involvement with the Trilogy ring redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 00:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]