User talk:Samsantiago

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samsantiago for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Diego Grez ^{what's up?} 01:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a promotional account.[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Atama頭 17:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samsantiago (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked 5 years ago. I remember being asked to change something which I did, then my account became blocked and I haven't attempted to get it unblocked till now. Samsantiago (talk) 02:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked as a blatant spammer, Sam. You will need to address that.Kuru (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.