User talk:Samswlee

Proposed deletion of Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly

Hello, Samswlee. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 23:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any conflict of interest of this book Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly. I'm the third party for the book.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Samswlee. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Eun Mihee, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any conflict of interest of this book Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly. I'm the third party for the book.

Speedy deletion nomination of Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC) I do not have any conflict of interest of this book Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly. I'm the third party for the book.[reply]

I do not have any conflict of interest of this book Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly. I'm the third party for the book.

I'm sorry but in that case you should explain this kind of statement "Please do not hesitate to join us so that we can help to offer solace to those who suffered, and for the sake of our own dignity. Even a small contribution will help bring peace to their souls, and will further the interests of truth and justice. Your donation will be used to publish a novel, ‘Flutter Flutter Butterfly,’ that is based on a real-world setting in the United States." Domdeparis (talk) 09:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the my cut and paste those sentences. I deleted those unacceptable sentences.

November 2017

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Flutter, Flutter, Butterfly while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 09:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand.