Jump to content

User talk:Samuel.harding

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

re:Gary Forrester

[edit]

No, go ahead - I just tried to keep them the same as the original ( for example there was #10 that wasn't cited anywhere at all in the text - left it in just in case) since i'm not comfortable with the material. —Random832 19:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

actually when I look at it, it looks like that [11] might have gone with the [10] in the original ref list (which is now alone at the bottom with a bullet point) - you might see if that reference makes sense for that statement. hold on, i'll fix it —Random832 19:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help

[edit]

There's a gap on the USA tour, regarding the appearances at Avoca Iowa (which I take it was a very big deal at the time). I don't have anything except correspondence. Do you have any newspaper articles, magazines, whatever? I'd like to put in a specific reference about Avoca.--Jeshel.brown (talk) 03:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Forrester + piping

[edit]

hi Samuel, piping's dead easy, it's just a way of linking things up so that you can direct to an article without the text having to link to it.

For example, if i wanted to write the sentence "Christgau said Coleman was a legend", but make the names redirect to Robert Christgau and Ornette Coleman, i could write [[Robert Christgau|Christgau]] and [[Ornette Coleman|Coleman]]. The article you want to redirect to goes first, then the pipe (|), then whatever text you want to appear on the actual page. Like so:

Christgau said Coleman was a legend.

With the Gary Forrester article, there were three countries linked up in a piped style, so it was displaying "USA" but linking to Australia! Hope this helps. Cheers, tomasz. 00:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, hi, and thanks for adding a note next to the Bluegrass Unlimited line at Gary Forrester.[1] But, um, where is this information from? If it's just personal knowledge, we can't use it. We need something that's actually been printed in a reliable source which calls the magazine a "bible", in order to say such a thing in a Wikipedia article. --Elonka 00:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks Elonka

[edit]

As per your suggestions, I've added quite a bit of background on Bluegrass Unlimited in the footnotes. Hopefully this will suffice. It is the most influential magazine in bluegrass, and has been for many many years. Cheers, --Samuel.harding (talk) 01:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Saw your comments regarding the article of Paul Kelly - thought you might want to have a look at the improvements that have been made - given that he has been inducted into the ARIA Hall of Fame his importance has been re-classified as mid however there is an arguement that HOFs should actually be high. Dan arndt (talk) 05:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eleven common denominator.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eleven common denominator.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]