Jump to content

User talk:SaraY Evo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Skopje. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 17:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Was this IP [1] you? If yes, then please: stop doing this now. If you continue edit-warring, you will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. 17:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit-warring, both through this account and while logged out., as you did at Skopje. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Fut.Perf. 08:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SaraY Evo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. I send the mail yesterday where I wrote (including sources!!!) that SKOPJE is NOT the 3. LARGEST CITY IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA!!!!!!! It is SARAJEVO. Due to the last census, Skopje has 668,518 inhabitants - Sarajevo has on the metropolitan area 801,335! SO WHERE IS THE PROBLEM????????? YOU CAN SEE THE OFFICAL STATISTIC FOR "GREATER SARAJEVO" and just sum app the offical 469,400 inhabitants of Sarajevo Canton, official estimated 120,000 inhabitants in East Sarajevo and official estimated 150,000 unreported people in the city of Sarajevo. If you add to those numbers 95,000 inhabitants of the municipalities Breza, Visoko, Kiseljak, Kresevo and Fojnica which also represent Sarajevo suburbs, you will get the number over 800,000. Sarajevo having some 130,000 more then Skopje, is third largest city in former Yugoslavia and not Skopje! Also while the yugoslavian census in 1991, Sarajevo had more inhabitants then Skopje. OFFICIAL CITY LIMITS (NOT AGGLOMERATION): Also, you have to use the last official census to compare two cities! Skopje census 2002: 506,926 Sarajevo census 1991: 578,049. SO WHO IS LARGER? Of course, it is still Sarajevo! If you have other arguments, please comment !'

Decline reason:

Even if you believe you're right, you may not edit-war; period. Wikipedia works on consensus. If you make an edit once and it gets reverted, you're required to discuss on the article talkpage BEFORE trying again. This unblock request does not show that you understand WHY you were blocked, but it does suggest that the behaviour will recur (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.