User talk:Sarisbariz

July 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Jenny Rissveds, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. OnlyNano^talk 21:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop reverting work done for the Armand Duplantis, it is completely valid for the article, and you have not specified any reason for removing the information regarding his choice for choosing Sweden over USA. If you wish to remove it, please use the talk page to discuss your reasons. Cltjames (talk) 23:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop reverting, and use talk page for Armand Duplantis. The text is a missing gap in explaining his progress from the USA to the Swedish Olympic team, as nowhere else in the article is this explained. And the text is verified by the Olympic website, if you read the reference. Again, stop the edit war, the text is adequate, I will report you if you continue to revert. Cltjames (talk) 14:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Felix (rapper). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove move discussion notifications, as you did at Armand Duplantis. Contribute to the discussion on the subject instead. --Marbe166 (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mariagarciacs per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mariagarciacs. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carrer (fashion brand)

The article Carrer (fashion brand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:19, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]