User talk:Scampi62

August 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of recurring The Simpsons characters, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 12:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Greggs. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Scuffedsherm (talk) 12:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Skateboarding trick. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Scuffedsherm (talk) 12:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which bit was false information? Scampi62 (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need a reference to include such information. Knitsey (talk) 12:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

none of the other parts have references. This is also not shown in the conditions Scampi62 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Backside Burger King Reverted Flippy Boi" bit. If you happen to have a source for this, you can add it in the article. Scuffedsherm (talk) 13:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you removed the entire edit because you don't know about skateboard tricks. Great job. Next time just remoce the bit you question and do your job properly. Thanks Scampi62 (talk) 13:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do admit not knowing any skateboard tricks but you are required to add sources to back them up. Please do so if you wish for it to remain in the article, otherwise it is deemed unconstructive. Scuffedsherm (talk) 13:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need to know anything about skateboarding, a quick search shows it doesn't exist. It is up to you to provide information that it does exist. Knitsey (talk) 13:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a better idea. Step off of subjects that you have little knowledge on, or do some research. Frankly,by removing helpful content, you are unconstructive Scampi62 (talk) 13:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Skateboarding trick, you may be blocked from editing. Knitsey (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

show me the conditions that prove that I need to comply with that threat Scampi62 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to WP:CS and WP:RS. Scuffedsherm (talk) 13:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is guidance material and only requires citations and sources for information likely to be challenged. I would disregard and challenge for someone uneducated in a subject though, as that would be like asking a McDonald's employee to service your car Scampi62 (talk) 13:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Frost 13:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not disrupting. I am doing exactly what I should be. I have read the guidelines. Please leave me alone Scampi62 (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool beans. It's free to make accounts and it's free to use a vpn Scampi62 (talk) 09:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. Doing so can be considered sockpuppetry and block evasion. Kolano123 (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]