User talk:Schgooda

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Schgooda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

pfctdayelise 03:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lecture Bashing[edit]

Schgooda, Consider this a quote for the dust cover of your book

"Schgooda is a keen intellect on this topic and his views should not be ignored... thought provoking, true and outstanding, a must read book for political hack and regular student alike"

                                    -Melbuniartsstudent

Gareth Ward[edit]

I have rewritten this article based on verifiable sources. I realise that local councillors are problematic under WP:BIO but this fellow has attracted some media interest with 46 results in an Australia-New Zealand database. I would be grateful if you could take a look.Capitalistroadster 02:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin, I've closed this debate for deletion. The majority result was to keep the article. -- Longhair 14:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brackswatch[edit]

I wanted to keep it, but it was removed and I wasn't getting any support on the talk page so I have left it. Xtra 08:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Schgooda! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ⁪froth^{T C} 00:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: VP[edit]

I assure you that you're on the approved users list. There's a problem with some users' approval (see pendego's comment here) but some users report it working only after being approved for awhile. This problem is unfortunate; there's one thing that I can try to get this thing sorted out for you, I'll get back to you in a couple of minutes. --⁪froth^{T C} 01:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Schgooda! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ⁪froth^{T C} 01:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK try it now. Does it work? --⁪froth^{T C} 01:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I can't really help you. Try contacting User:AmiDaniel on his talk page. Best of luck --⁪froth^{T C} 01:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Alternative (Australia)[edit]

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Socialist Alternative (Australia), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Alec ^{-(answering machine)} 13:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TedBaillieu.jpg[edit]

The file File:TedBaillieu.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]